Supreme Court Curbs President’s Appointment Powers

Must Read

Epstein Latest: Did Guards Falsify Records?

Ben Swann takes a look at the latest in the death of Epstein, including the autopsy results, the claim...

Reality Check: Rep. Omar’s Comments On Israel Were Not Anti-Semitic

Leading House Democrats, including Nancy Pelosi plan to offer a resolution Wednesday condemning anti-Semitism in response to Congresswoman Ilhan...

Reality Check: Will U.S. Use “Humanitarian Aid” As Justification for Regime Change in Venezuela?

Is the U.S. military under the Trump administration about to forcibly create regime change in Venezuela? For months I have...
Annabelle Bamforth
New Hampshire-based writer Annabelle Bamforth is TruthInMedia.com's editor-in-chief, focused on breaking the left/right paradigm through new media and local politics. To share a news tip, contact annabelle@truthinmedia.com.

In another unanimous decision Thursday, the Supreme Court has ruled that President Obama overstepped his authority in making three appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in January 2012. The appointments were ruled invalid because he never sought “advice and consent” from the Senate.

The president is usually required to consult the Senate before appointing high-ranking federal officials. President Obama used the Recess Appointments Clause of the Constitution to appoint the individuals. The Clause states: The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session. This clause was more meaningful in earlier days when recesses lasted much longer.

However, the Senate was not technically in recess at the time. Senate Republicans were in fact holding pro forma sessions, during a 20-day recess, that specifically blocked President Obama from making recess appointments. Every three days, a Senator would arrive at the chambers, call a meeting to order, and then immediately call a recess.

The Supreme Court agreed that the Senate was not formally in recess. “In our view, however, the pro forma sessions count as sessions, not as periods of recess. We hold that, for pur­poses of the Recess Appointments Clause, the Senate is in session when it says it is, provided that, under its own rules, it retains the capacity to transact Senate business. The Senate met that standard here,” read the ruling.

The ruling reins in attempts from the President, as well as future presidents, to use the Recess Appointments Clause loosely to appoint officials that the Senate may refuse to approve. The following graph shows the documented number of recess appointments by president dating back to 1981:

graph

Follow Annabelle on Facebook and Twitter.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest News

video

Epstein Latest: Did Guards Falsify Records?

Ben Swann takes a look at the latest in the death of Epstein, including the autopsy results, the claim...
video

Reality Check: Rep. Omar’s Comments On Israel Were Not Anti-Semitic

Leading House Democrats, including Nancy Pelosi plan to offer a resolution Wednesday condemning anti-Semitism in response to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s latest remarks on Israel. House...

Reality Check: Will U.S. Use “Humanitarian Aid” As Justification for Regime Change in Venezuela?

Is the U.S. military under the Trump administration about to forcibly create regime change in Venezuela? For months I have been saying that would not...

See Ben Swann Speak In Miami!

In partnership with Keynote, Isegoria- spearheaded by Truth In Media founder Ben Swann- is sponsoring 50 tickets to the world’s most influential community members
video

Introducing ISE Media Network!

ISE Media Network is a 24-hour news and entertainment streaming platform built with blockchain technology in response to the widespread systematic censorship of independent...
- Advertisement -

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -