Listen to "Reality Check with Ben Swann" on Spreaker.

CA Governor Vetoes Bill Prohibiting Warrantless Drone Spying

On Sunday, California Governor Jerry Brown vetoed AB1327, a bill that would have required law enforcement officers to obtain a warrant before using an unmanned drone to conduct surveillance on citizens. It also would have prohibited state agencies from using weaponized drones.

Must Read

Protecting Free Speech with Unstoppable Domains

Software company Unstoppable Domains is aiming to put an end to online censorship by providing blockchain-based domains.

Ben Swann Breaks Down ABC News Fake Video of Syria Massacre

Mainstream media outlets across the country have been rigorously covering the news of President Trump pulling troops out of...

John McAfee Wants Us to Wake Up

In episode 5 of Truth In Media with Ben Swann, John McAfee and I discuss the mass surveillance state,...
Barry Donegan
Barry Donegan is a writer, musician, and pro-liberty political activist living in Nashville, TN. Donegan served as Director-at-Large of the Davidson County Republican Party from 2009-2011 and was the Middle Tennessee Regional Coordinator over 30 counties for Ron Paul's 2012 Presidential Campaign. Follow him at facebook.com/barry.donegan and twitter.com/barrydonegan

Given the fact that unmanned drones provide law enforcement agencies with unprecedented spying capabilities, unimaginable by the authors of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, civil libertarians across America have voiced concerns that these tools could be used in violation of the basic privacy protections enshrined in the Fourth Amendment. This sentiment among California’s electorate led to the rise of AB1327, Republican Assemblyman Jeff Gorell’s state-level bill to limit law enforcement officers’ ability to spy on citizens using unmanned drones. AB1327 soared through the California State Legislature, passing the General Assembly by a 68 to 4 vote and the Senate with 26 for and 8 against. According to The Wall Street JournalCalifornia Governor Jerry Brown vetoed the anti-spying bill on Sunday, citing concerns that it would place excessive limits on police agencies.

AB1327 would have required cops to acquire a warrant before conducting surveillance with a drone. It also would have required law enforcement agencies to publicly announce the purchase and deployment of drones. Under the bill, law enforcement agents would be prohibited from publicizing images and video taken by a drone and would be required to delete that type of content within one year of capturing it. The bill would have also banned state-level government agencies “from equipping or arming an unmanned aircraft system with a weapon or other device that may be carried by or launched from an unmanned aircraft system and that is intended to cause bodily injury or death, or damage to, or the destruction of, real or personal property.”

Though Governor Jerry Brown voiced concerns that law enforcement agencies would have their hands tied by the bill, AB1327 contains broad exceptions to the warrant requirement, allowing for warrantless drone use in scenarios such as environmental disasters, search-and-rescue operations, fires, hostage crises, hot pursuits, and other emergency situations. In Brown’s statement announcing his veto of the legislation, he said, “There are undoubtedly circumstances where a warrant is appropriate. The bill’s exceptions, however, appear to be too narrow and could impose requirements beyond what is required by either the Fourth Amendment or the privacy provisions in the California Constitution.”

- Newsletter -

Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey slammed Governor Brown’s veto of the legislation, saying, “This is an absurd veto and tells me that Gov. Brown doesn’t give a damn about privacy… The exceptions to the warrant requirement included in the bill were more than adequate. Jerry makes it sound like he took some kind of oath forbidding him to protect privacy too much. I mean really? Does he really think a law can’t go beyond what the courts have said? Civil libertarians in California should take note.”

According to The Wall Street Journal, Assemblyman Jeff Gorell expressed his disappointment that the bill was vetoed, saying that the legislation would have “provided common-sense protection to protect privacy rights and civil liberties.”

- Advertisement -

Featrued Sponsors

Holland Center

Holland Center is a day treatment program and medical clinic for children with autism.

Life Info App

Support TiM by using the app to get cash back at major retailers.

Pure VPN

Military grade privacy on all devices.
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Protecting Free Speech with Unstoppable Domains

Software company Unstoppable Domains is aiming to put an end to online censorship by providing blockchain-based domains.
video

Ben Swann Breaks Down ABC News Fake Video of Syria Massacre

Mainstream media outlets across the country have been rigorously covering the news of President Trump pulling troops out of Northern Syria. But are these...
video

John McAfee Wants Us to Wake Up

In episode 5 of Truth In Media with Ben Swann, John McAfee and I discuss the mass surveillance state, government’s control over citizens through...
video

Is the Trump Whistleblower Really a Whistleblower? (ft. John Kiriakou & Thomas Drake)

The mysterious whistleblower at the center of the impeachment complaint against President Trump is being fiercely protected by government officials and the mainstream media....
video

California’s New Vaccine Law Puts Kids In Danger

The new law in California which bans medical exemptions for vaccines puts thousands of children in harms way. The law prevents doctors from exempting...
- Advertisement -

More Articles Like This